Geometry + application
Current CAD/drawing, installation context, mating components, load, temperature, contact media and appearance zones.
Evidence review 01 / new part + mold
How an industrial enclosure program can connect application requirements, thermoplastic selection, moldability and approval evidence before recurring production begins.

Problem definition
Mounting points, connectors, ribs, bosses, sealing or ventilation features, appearance surfaces and mating parts all change the mold and inspection conversation. Quoting only from outside dimensions leaves the important risks unowned.
Current CAD/drawing, installation context, mating components, load, temperature, contact media and appearance zones.
Thermoplastic grade, wall transitions, draft, ribs, bosses, undercuts, gate/ejection visibility and distortion risk.
Critical dimensions, assembly fit, surface condition and project-specific functional evidence identified before trial release.
Decision chain
Each gate ends with an artifact the buyer can review. The exact artifact and acceptance limit are confirmed in the written project plan.
Lock revision, application, annual demand, service conditions, mating context and critical features.
Record geometry observations, proposed changes, material assumptions and unresolved tests.
Confirm cavity strategy, gate/ejection intent, visible surfaces, trial samples and correction ownership.
Connect dimensional, visual, fit and functional checks to the approved sample and current revision.
Evidence packet
The purpose of the packet is not paperwork volume. It is to connect the released component to the decisions that made it acceptable.
Prepared by SRRP Engineering Content Team. Engineering publication review: SRRP Injection Molding Project Review. Published and updated 31 July 2026. Customer identity and commercial data withheld.